Analysis: Effectiveness of Ventilation + Barrier

I will continue the analysis of the cooling effectiveness of my home, skipping forward to 2009. The improvements in 2007 (related to ventilation) have been enhanced by the addition of a foil radiant barrier and a 14 SEER air conditioner (to replace the failed 11 SEER unit).
Here is a graph of energy usage vs. Cooling Degree Days (CDD's, see previous posts for explanation) for 2005 and 2009. Since 2009 isn't over yet, I have substituted 2008 data for both November and December, but neither of those months is real significant for cooling costs.

1. Again, as in the previous post, the hysteresis of the system is quite apparent.
   
2. As expected from personal experience, the 2009 loop extends almost 100 CDDs further to the right than the 2005 loop, indicating the record breaking HOT summer here.
3. The curve for 2009, while showing some positive slope, looks almost unfazed by the increasing heat.

So at a glance, it appears that adding the radiant barrier and more efficient air conditioner to the already improved 2007 system has helped. But how much? Let's perform our linear best fit again and look at the results:


Including the numbers from our last post covering 2007, here are the final results of this analysis method:
2005 Slope: 2.8 kWh/CDD
2007 Slope: 1.1 kWh/CDD
2009 Slope: 0.84 kWh / CDD
So, by 2009, the effectiveness of my cooling system has increased again. Stated as "kWh of energy to cool 1 CDD", the effectiveness has gone up from:
(1/2.8)= 0.35 CDD per kWh expended to
(1/0.84)=1.19 CDD per kWh expended.
Finally: something meaningful to compare. Stated as simply as I can, based on linear best-fit analysis to remove weather dependencies:

The energy cost of cooling my home 1 degree has dropped 70% due to my efforts.

How much energy is that, in human terms?

As I have wandered through the Web in search of hard information about energy efficiency, I have come to learn a little bit about the scale of energy that is required to run houses as we have built them in my neighborhood. Perhaps some of you have wondered, as I have, if there are not better ways to provide that energy. Maybe I could take human-generated energy, from riding an exercise bike, and use that to power part of my home.
Powering my home for a day in 2007, after my initial set of improvements, required anywhere from 9 to 37 kilowatt hours (kWh) of electricity, with the average being about 22 kWh.

To put that in human terms, when I ride hard on an exercise bike at the gym, I can generate around 100 Watts (0.1 kW), perhaps double that in short bursts, according to the readout attached to the bike. So riding hard for 1 hour, using my body to generate power, would yield 1 hour X 0.1 kW = 0.1 kWh. In fact, if I pedaled all day without drinking, eating, or sleeping, and used that energy to power my home, I would generate 24 hours X 0.1 kW = 2.4 kWh, slightly more than 10% of my energy use on an average day.
To extrapolate further, to power my relatively modest needs, I would need 10 people riding generator bikes 24 hours a day, for every day of the year. Of course, no one could keep that up... to allow for breaks for eating, sleeping, and recovery, I'd probably need 20 or 30 people, pedaling as much as they could stand, every day.
In other words, my energy needs go _way_ beyond what I can provide with human power.